The proof for Euler formula and identity using power series is ubiquitous on the internet. However, I will include it here to amplify the power of substitution. The derivation of Euler formula is useful in obtaining the exponential form of sin(x) and cos(x).
We have:
ex=1+x+x22!+x33!+x44!+x55!+x66!+O(x7)
sin(x)=x−x33!+x55!−x77!+x99!−x1111!+x1313!+O(x15)
cos(x)=1−x22!+x44!−x66!+x88!−x1010!+x1212!+O(x14)
We are looking for the series representation of eix, so we can substitute ix into x in the series of ex, we have:
eix=1+ix+(ix)22!+(ix)33!+(ix)44!+(ix)55!+(ix)66!+O(x7)
where i is the imaginary number √−1
We have i1=i; i2=−1; i3=i2⋅i=−i;i4=1; i5=i; i6=−1; i7=−i
Thus:
eix=1+ix−x22!−ix33!+x44!+ix55!−x66!−ix77!+O(x8)
Rearrange the terms and factor i, we will have
eix=(1−x22!+x44!−x66!...)+i(x−x33!+x55!−x77!...)
eix=cos(x)+isin(x) (QED)
Euler identity
From this, we can easily obtain the Euler's identity:
eix=cos(x)+isin(x)
⟹eiπ=cos(π)+isin(π)=−1+0
⟹eiπ=−1
Euler formula for hyperbolic function
Similar to the Euler formula, we can also derive
sinh(x)=x+x33!+x55!+x77!+x99!+x1111!+x1313!+O(x15)
cosh(x)=1+x22!+x44!+x66!+x88!+x1010!+x1212!+O(x14)
ex=1+x+x22!+x33!+x44!+x55!+x66!+O(x7)
ex=cosh(x)+sinh(x)
Exponential form of sin(x)
We can also derive two principal identities for sin(x) and cos(x), and then find the relationship between them and sinh(x) and cosh(x)
Proof that sin(ix)=isinh(x)
The relationship between sin(x) and sinh(x) can be expressed as followed:
Recall that sinh(x)=ex−e−x2⟹−sinh(x)=e−x−ex2
The relationship between cos(x) and cosh(x) is that:
De Moivre Formula
This formula can be easily proven once the proof of Euler formula is established:
eix−e−ix=cos(x)+isin(x)−[cos(−x)+isin(−x)]
=cos(x)+isin(x)−cos(x)−(−isin(x)) (Since sin(x) is odd)
=cos(x)+isin(x)−cos(x)+isin(x) (Red terms denote elimination)
=2isin(x)⟹eix−e−ix2i=sin(x)
Exponential form of sinh(x)
ex−e−x=cosh(x)+sinh(x)−[cosh(−x)+sinh(−x)]
=cosh(x)+sinh(x)−cosh(x)−(sinh(x) (Since sinh(x) is odd)
=cosh(x)+sinh(x)−cosh(x)+sinh(x) (Red terms denote elimination)
=2sinh(x)⟹ex−e−x2=sinh(x)
Proof that sin(ix)=isinh(x)
The relationship between sin(x) and sinh(x) can be expressed as followed:
Recall that sinh(x)=ex−e−x2⟹−sinh(x)=e−x−ex2
sin(ix)=ei2x−e−i2x2i=e−x−ex2i=−sinh(x)i=i2sinh(x)i=isinh(x)
Exponential form of cos(x)
eix+e−ix=cos(x)+isin(x)+[cos(−x)+isin(−x)]
=cos(x)+isin(x)+cos(x)−isin(x)
=2cos(x)⟹eix+e−ix2=cos(x)
Exponential form of cosh(x)
ex+e−x=cosh(x)+sinh(x)+[cosh(−x)+sinh(−x)]
=cosh(x)+sinh(x)+cosh(x)−sinh(x)
=2cosh(x)⟹ex+e−x2=cosh(x)
Proof that cos(ix)=cosh(x)
cos(ix)=ei2x+e(−i)2x2=e−x+ex2=cosh(x)
De Moivre Formula
This formula can be easily proven once the proof of Euler formula is established:
[cos(x)+isin(x)]n=(eix)n=einx=cos(nx)+isin(nx)
Prove de Moivre Formula by induction
To be more rigorous, we can prove De Moivre formula by using induction:
What we need to prove is
[cos(x)+isin(x)]n=cos(nx)+isin(nx)
We prove for the base case n=1, we have
We have
cos(x)+isin(x)=cos(x)+isin(x) (Proved)
Let n=k, assume that the equality holds for k
[cos(x)+isin(x)]k=cos(kx)+isin(kx)
We prove that this is true for k+1, we have for the LHS:
=[cos(x)+isin(x)]k+1
=[cos(x)+isin(x)]k[cos(x)+isin(x)]
=[cos(kx)+isin(kx)][cos(x)+isin(x)]
=[cos(kx)cos(x)+icos(kx)sin(x)+isin(kx)cos(x)+i2sin(kx)sin(x)]
=[cos(kx)cos(x)+icos(kx)sin(x)+isin(kx)cos(x)−sin(kx)sin(x)]
=[cos(kx)cos(x)−sin(kx)sin(x)+i[cos(kx)sin(x)+sin(kx)cos(x)]
Apply the trigonometric formula:
cos(x+y)=cos(x)cos(y)−sin(x)sin(y)
sin(x+y)=sin(x)cos(y)+sin(y)sin(x)
We have
cos(kx+x)+i[sin(kx+x)]=cos[(k+1)x]+isin[(k+1)x]
cos[(kx+1)x]+i[sin[(kx+1)x]]=cos[(k+1)x]+isin[(k+1)x] (Q.E.D)